Blog · Supply chain
What fabless means for your supply chain
Fabless, foundry and IDM are not just business models: they change where your risk sits.
If you buy silicon, sooner or later you care about how your supplier is organised. The industry's three models are not equivalent from a risk point of view.
The three models
IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer). Designs and manufactures under one roof. It controls the whole process, but carries the fixed cost of operating plants — and the pressure to keep them loaded.
Foundry. Manufactures what others design. It has no products of its own; it sells manufacturing capacity.
Fabless. Designs and does not manufacture. It contracts production out to a foundry. Its asset is intellectual property, not a plant.
Where the risk sits in each case
For a buyer, the practical difference is in what breaks when something breaks.
- With an IDM, design and capacity are coupled. If their plant has a problem, your supply has a problem, and there is no natural second source.
- With a fabless supplier, the design is portable in principle. If the foundry fails, migration is possible — expensive and slow, but possible.
- With licensed IP instead of a component, you do the integrating. The dependency on a physical part disappears: what you receive is files.
That last point is the one most often overlooked. Licensing an IP block instead of buying a chip does not eliminate supply risk — it moves it into your own relationship with your foundry, which you probably already manage.
What to ask a fabless supplier
- Is the design portable across processes, or tied to one specific foundry?
- What exactly do I receive: RTL, a model, documentation, verification vectors?
- What happens to my licence if the company disappears? Is there source code escrow?
- How much of the design can I inspect before committing?
The fourth separates suppliers fastest. A core published under an open licence answers it without a non-disclosure agreement, and incidentally reduces exposure on the other three: if you can read the algorithm, your dependency on the supplier is smaller than it would be with a black box.
Why we chose to be fabless
For a young company the immediate reason is capital: a plant costs orders of magnitude more than a design team, and that capital is not recoverable if the product does not find a market.
But there is a second, less obvious reason. With no plant to fill, there is no pressure to sell volume in order to amortise idle capacity. We can afford to tell a customer that our block is not right for their case — and sometimes that is the correct answer.